The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
Em meio a visões conflitantes sobre se o esquema de detecção de energia cooperativa suave (SCEDS) supera muito o esquema de detecção de energia cooperativa dura (HCEDS) no rádio cognitivo, estabelecemos a ponte que conecta matematicamente o SCEDS e o HCEDS por aproximações fechadas. Através desta ponte, demonstra-se que, se o número de detectores do HCEDS for 1.6 vezes maior que o do SCEDS, eles têm quase o mesmo desempenho que é confirmado por simulações numéricas, permitindo uma avaliação quantitativa da relação entre eles e uma resolução de as visões conflitantes.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copiar
Junyang SHEN, Gang XIE, Siyang LIU, Lingkang ZENG, Jinchun GAO, Yuanan LIU, "Soft versus Hard Cooperative Energy Detection under Low SNR" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications,
vol. E91-B, no. 11, pp. 3732-3735, November 2008, doi: 10.1093/ietcom/e91-b.11.3732.
Abstract: Amidst conflicting views about whether soft cooperative energy detection scheme (SCEDS) outperforms hard cooperative energy detection scheme (HCEDS) greatly in cognitive radio, we establish the bridge that mathematically connects SCEDS and HCEDS by closed approximations. Through this bridge, it is demonstrate that, if the number of detectors of HCEDS is 1.6 times as that of SCEDS, they have nearly the same performance which is confirmed by numerical simulations, enabling a quantitative evaluation of the relation between them and a resolution of the conflicting views.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/communications/10.1093/ietcom/e91-b.11.3732/_p
Copiar
@ARTICLE{e91-b_11_3732,
author={Junyang SHEN, Gang XIE, Siyang LIU, Lingkang ZENG, Jinchun GAO, Yuanan LIU, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications},
title={Soft versus Hard Cooperative Energy Detection under Low SNR},
year={2008},
volume={E91-B},
number={11},
pages={3732-3735},
abstract={Amidst conflicting views about whether soft cooperative energy detection scheme (SCEDS) outperforms hard cooperative energy detection scheme (HCEDS) greatly in cognitive radio, we establish the bridge that mathematically connects SCEDS and HCEDS by closed approximations. Through this bridge, it is demonstrate that, if the number of detectors of HCEDS is 1.6 times as that of SCEDS, they have nearly the same performance which is confirmed by numerical simulations, enabling a quantitative evaluation of the relation between them and a resolution of the conflicting views.},
keywords={},
doi={10.1093/ietcom/e91-b.11.3732},
ISSN={1745-1345},
month={November},}
Copiar
TY - JOUR
TI - Soft versus Hard Cooperative Energy Detection under Low SNR
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SP - 3732
EP - 3735
AU - Junyang SHEN
AU - Gang XIE
AU - Siyang LIU
AU - Lingkang ZENG
AU - Jinchun GAO
AU - Yuanan LIU
PY - 2008
DO - 10.1093/ietcom/e91-b.11.3732
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
SN - 1745-1345
VL - E91-B
IS - 11
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Communications
Y1 - November 2008
AB - Amidst conflicting views about whether soft cooperative energy detection scheme (SCEDS) outperforms hard cooperative energy detection scheme (HCEDS) greatly in cognitive radio, we establish the bridge that mathematically connects SCEDS and HCEDS by closed approximations. Through this bridge, it is demonstrate that, if the number of detectors of HCEDS is 1.6 times as that of SCEDS, they have nearly the same performance which is confirmed by numerical simulations, enabling a quantitative evaluation of the relation between them and a resolution of the conflicting views.
ER -