The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
Apresentamos uma estratégia de projeto para reduzir as demandas de energia em sistemas multiprocessadores heterogêneos e específicos de aplicações com subtarefas interdependentes. Este esquema de redução de potência pode ser usado com uma pesquisa aleatória, como um algoritmo genético onde múltiplas soluções experimentais são testadas. O esquema é aplicado a cada solução experimental após a alocação e escalonamento terem sido realizados. A economia de energia é obtida expandindo igualmente o tempo de execução de cada processador com uma redução correspondente na respectiva tensão operacional. As soluções de menor custo alcançam reduções médias de 24%, enquanto as soluções de energia mínima atingem uma média de 58%.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copiar
Allan RAE, Sri PARAMESWARAN, "Voltage Reduction of Application-Specific Heterogeneous Multiprocessor Systems for Power Minimisation" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals,
vol. E84-A, no. 9, pp. 2296-2302, September 2001, doi: .
Abstract: We present a design strategy to reduce power demands in application-specific, heterogeneous multiprocessor systems with interdependent subtasks. This power reduction scheme can be used with a randomised search such as a genetic algorithm where multiple trial solutions are tested. The scheme is applied to each trial solution after allocation and scheduling have been performed. Power savings are achieved by equally expanding each processor's execution time with a corresponding reduction in their respective operating voltage. Lowest cost solutions achieve average reductions of 24% while minimum power solutions average 58%.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/fundamentals/10.1587/e84-a_9_2296/_p
Copiar
@ARTICLE{e84-a_9_2296,
author={Allan RAE, Sri PARAMESWARAN, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals},
title={Voltage Reduction of Application-Specific Heterogeneous Multiprocessor Systems for Power Minimisation},
year={2001},
volume={E84-A},
number={9},
pages={2296-2302},
abstract={We present a design strategy to reduce power demands in application-specific, heterogeneous multiprocessor systems with interdependent subtasks. This power reduction scheme can be used with a randomised search such as a genetic algorithm where multiple trial solutions are tested. The scheme is applied to each trial solution after allocation and scheduling have been performed. Power savings are achieved by equally expanding each processor's execution time with a corresponding reduction in their respective operating voltage. Lowest cost solutions achieve average reductions of 24% while minimum power solutions average 58%.},
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={September},}
Copiar
TY - JOUR
TI - Voltage Reduction of Application-Specific Heterogeneous Multiprocessor Systems for Power Minimisation
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SP - 2296
EP - 2302
AU - Allan RAE
AU - Sri PARAMESWARAN
PY - 2001
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
SN -
VL - E84-A
IS - 9
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Fundamentals
Y1 - September 2001
AB - We present a design strategy to reduce power demands in application-specific, heterogeneous multiprocessor systems with interdependent subtasks. This power reduction scheme can be used with a randomised search such as a genetic algorithm where multiple trial solutions are tested. The scheme is applied to each trial solution after allocation and scheduling have been performed. Power savings are achieved by equally expanding each processor's execution time with a corresponding reduction in their respective operating voltage. Lowest cost solutions achieve average reductions of 24% while minimum power solutions average 58%.
ER -