The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. ex. Some numerals are expressed as "XNUMX".
Copyrights notice
The original paper is in English. Non-English content has been machine-translated and may contain typographical errors or mistranslations. Copyrights notice
O kO problema da exclusão mútua é o problema de garantir que não mais do que k nós de computação entram em uma seção crítica simultaneamente. O uso de um k-coterie, que é um conjunto especial de grupos de nós, é conhecido como uma abordagem robusta para este problema. Em geral, k-os círculos são classificados como dominados ou não dominados, e um mecanismo de exclusão mútua tem disponibilidade máxima quando emprega um não dominado. k- círculo. Neste artigo, propomos dois novos esquemas chamados VOT e D-VOT para construir k-coterias. Realizamos uma avaliação comparativa dos esquemas propostos e dos esquemas anteriores bem conhecidos. Os resultados mostram claramente a superioridade dos esquemas propostos.
The copyright of the original papers published on this site belongs to IEICE. Unauthorized use of the original or translated papers is prohibited. See IEICE Provisions on Copyright for details.
Copiar
Eun Hye CHOI, Tatsuhiro TSUCHIYA, Tohru KIKUNO, "New Constructions for Nondominated k-Coteries" in IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information,
vol. E83-D, no. 7, pp. 1526-1532, July 2000, doi: .
Abstract: The k-mutual exclusion problem is the problem of guaranteeing that no more than k computing nodes enter a critical section simultaneously. The use of a k-coterie, which is a special set of node groups, is known as a robust approach to this problem. In general, k-coteries are classified as either dominated or nondominated, and a mutual exclusion mechanism has maximal availability when it employs a nondominated k-coterie. In this paper, we propose two new schemes called VOT and D-VOT for constructing nondominated k-coteries. We conduct a comparative evaluation of the proposed schemes and well-known previous schemes. The results clearly show the superiority of the proposed schemes.
URL: https://global.ieice.org/en_transactions/information/10.1587/e83-d_7_1526/_p
Copiar
@ARTICLE{e83-d_7_1526,
author={Eun Hye CHOI, Tatsuhiro TSUCHIYA, Tohru KIKUNO, },
journal={IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information},
title={New Constructions for Nondominated k-Coteries},
year={2000},
volume={E83-D},
number={7},
pages={1526-1532},
abstract={The k-mutual exclusion problem is the problem of guaranteeing that no more than k computing nodes enter a critical section simultaneously. The use of a k-coterie, which is a special set of node groups, is known as a robust approach to this problem. In general, k-coteries are classified as either dominated or nondominated, and a mutual exclusion mechanism has maximal availability when it employs a nondominated k-coterie. In this paper, we propose two new schemes called VOT and D-VOT for constructing nondominated k-coteries. We conduct a comparative evaluation of the proposed schemes and well-known previous schemes. The results clearly show the superiority of the proposed schemes.},
keywords={},
doi={},
ISSN={},
month={July},}
Copiar
TY - JOUR
TI - New Constructions for Nondominated k-Coteries
T2 - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SP - 1526
EP - 1532
AU - Eun Hye CHOI
AU - Tatsuhiro TSUCHIYA
AU - Tohru KIKUNO
PY - 2000
DO -
JO - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
SN -
VL - E83-D
IS - 7
JA - IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information
Y1 - July 2000
AB - The k-mutual exclusion problem is the problem of guaranteeing that no more than k computing nodes enter a critical section simultaneously. The use of a k-coterie, which is a special set of node groups, is known as a robust approach to this problem. In general, k-coteries are classified as either dominated or nondominated, and a mutual exclusion mechanism has maximal availability when it employs a nondominated k-coterie. In this paper, we propose two new schemes called VOT and D-VOT for constructing nondominated k-coteries. We conduct a comparative evaluation of the proposed schemes and well-known previous schemes. The results clearly show the superiority of the proposed schemes.
ER -